The U.S. Supreme Court has stayed the preliminary injunction in the Texas Top Cop Shop case, allowing FINCEN Beneficial Ownership Interest Reporting to proceed.
President Trump’s Inauguration lunch brought together lawmakers, Cabinet nominees, Supreme Court justices and distinguished guests Monday afternoon, in a quadrennial tradition that takes
A top law firm is representing the president as he appeals his conviction in the one criminal case of his that went to trial before he won the 2024 presidential election.
Supporters of charter schools and church-state separation describe a ‘tumultuous moment’ as the debate heads for April oral arguments.
The porn industry’s sizable influence aside, it was easy to miss (with all the inauguration buzz) that its cynically named interest group, the Free Speech Coalition, challenged Texas’ age-verification law before the U.S. Supreme Court.
The court will address a lower court decision deeming the school's funding to be unconstitutional. Notably, a majority of the justices profess the Roman Catholic faith. Associate Justices Brett Kavanaugh, Amy Coney Barrett, Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas, and Sonia Sotomayor, as well as Chief Justice John Roberts, are all Catholic.
While acknowledging President Donald Trump’s recent penchant for throwing in a wild card or two (or three) when choosing candidates to fill positions in his administration, legal experts have little doubt that by the end of his second term there will be more judges on the federal bench skeptical of government efforts to regulate the marketplace and limit property rights.
The Supreme Court on Tuesday grappled with the case of Patrick Daley Thompson, a former Chicago alderman and member of Chicago’s most storied political dynasty. Thompson served four months in a federal prison for making false statements to bank regulators about loans he took out and did not repay.
Keep Nine Amendment would enshrine in the U.S. Constitution a provision to keep the number of Supreme Court justices at nine members.
The Supreme Court heard arguments in a case on Wednesday that could make it easier to hold police officers accountable for use of deadly force.
The justices heard arguments over whether courts must limit their scrutiny of challenges to police shootings to “the moment of threat.”
The Supreme Court will consider whether to order new nationwide precedent about how lower courts will consider facts over police shootings.